Judicial-Inc.biz

The media are owned and controlled by a fairly small group of people and it is at least possible that they act together. If they have the same interests and act in similar ways it can seem like conspiracy. Media people qualify as a subculture but they have been disturbed by the arrival of the Internet which allows millions of people to by pass them and put what they want into the very public domain. One man who does just that is The Skunk. He produces Judicial-Inc.biz and a series of brief and interesting pictorial articles. They even have music to go with them. Are they right? Sadly it seems not.

His articles are brief but not reliable. Carlos Porter does his analysis below and evidently knows rather more about the facts. This does not mean that Judicial  is wrong about a basic issue but his stuff does need independent support before it is relied on. See the entries  in yellow.

He has a political view and if you do not believe that the media are telling it like it is he is worth a look but accuracy is not his forte. There are much better sources out there.

The alternative media and that means Internet media is very important. Knowledge is power we are told sometimes. Knowing the right things means that we are less likely to make mistakes. Cynics would say that is why the media keep us uninformed.

The Wikipedia is very much part of the main stream media and keen to throw us off the scent of the truth. However in this case their editors have got him right.

Judicial Will Probably Wind Down
Requiem or marketing ploy? We will see later [ than August 2009 ].

 

The Skunk (writer)
This article from the Wikipedia tells us that The Skunk is the author of Judicial-inc.biz Further that he does not like Jews and is extremely well informed about them. By the same token his article about The Wikipedia tells us that it is owned and controlled by Jews. I took that to mean that he is spot on with his critiques. His basic thrust is sound.

 

Judicial-Inc.biz
Is run by The Skunk who is critical of Jews and Zionists and so well informed that the Wikipedia is worried about him.
QUOTE
He also runs and writes Judicial-Inc.biz which is one of the most influential anti-judaistic sites on the internet, and one of the most reliable. His comments are so shockingly accurate that one wonders if he is a Zionist Jewish insider with a grudge or agenda?!
UNQUOTE on 9 March 2006.

That kind of endorsement from his enemies [ see  The Wikipedia ] ] is highly convincing. I thought he was  good anyway. Given this it is interesting that his Alexa rating has just dropped a lot.

PS, that is what it said on 9 March 2006. On the 13 March it had been reversed.

QUOTE
He also runs and writes Judicial-Inc.biz which is one of the most influential, yet unreliable, anti- Semitic sites on the internet, and one of the most outrageously dishonest, concerning evidence and facts. He proffers photos and evidence, which have been outted as false or doctored.
UNQUOTE on  13 March

 

Judicial on Judicial
Not actual picture
Judicial-Inc
Judicial is strictly a website that theorizes with 'What-If' scenarios. Whether it is a theory about Juba the sniper, or the 'Tale of Anne Frank', the author leaves it up to you to decide.

With today's internet you can Google and check basic facts in 15 minutes [ but not with his unsourced offerings - Editor ]. The contention that Judicial is paranoid about Israeli false flags in Iraq are countered by the USS Liberty, 9/11, USS Cole, the Lavon affair, the Tripoli affair, or countless others.

 

Strange Doings at Judicial-Inc.Biz
Judicial has interesting output but then you might notice that things are not being justified by his sources and that his sources are not linked and cannot be checked. Mr. Porter gives an analysis of his output and tells us not to rely on him. I will not.

 

The Judicial-Inc.Biz Great Chateau Hoax
A chateau is a chateau. Yes but if you say that is the chateau where it all happened and it turns out that it is another chateau altogether and that you know perfectly well that it is another chateau people might wonder whether you are reliable.