Metapedia Versus Wikipedia

The Metapedia arose because the Wikipedia is political and influential. Too many people use the latter for it to be ignored. But the truth has power which is why it worth publishing an alternative. The Wiki people got sulky about it and deleted their article on the upstart. Censoring the truth, controlling what people know is their basic objective when things get political or the agenda is operational. Now they have stopped being sulky and gotten abusive instead. There have also been legal attacks. See for yourself what they have to say about the Metapedia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, that nasty white nationalist, white supremacist, extreme right-wing online encyclopedia. It is fair to say that the Metapedia's people have an article about the Wikipedia. They look truth in the eye.
PS They tell us about other Wikis at http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikis.

Get Back
The Beatles did various versions when they were writing and recording this song and others. It could all be quite spontaneous. The Metapedia is up front about it. The Wiki is evasive. The lads from Liverpool were inviting Third World efnicks to go back.

 

The Metapedia Explains The Wikipedia
QUOTE
Wikipedia is a far-left and Judeocentric, multilingual wiki project, censured by an internal bureaucracy of tribal editing clans to conform to a largely neo-Marxist and Zionist viewpoint.^[1] While the sheer multitude of articles means that some pieces fall outside of this paradigm, where it matters most Jewish ethnocentrism is enforced. The project was founded in 2001 by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, with money obtained through the Bomis pornography ring.^[2][3] At present Wikipedia has around 16 million articles in 253 languages. While the Wikimedia Foundation which owns the project is based in San Francisco, California, the main Wikipedia servers are in Florida, with additional ones in Amsterdam and Seoul.

The personal philosophy of its founders emerged from a supposedly "libertarian" college student worldview of Rand and Hayek. As with free-market fanaticism in real life, this ideology contained within it, the seeds of Wikipedia's own undermining. Drawn by the desire to control the flow of information transmitted to the masses, various editors of Marxist and Zionist political persuasions, were able to secure for themselves administrative positions, through persistance and playing the community game tactfully.^[1] They proceded to organise themselves into bureucratic clan groups, which come together to manipulate articles with their own bias agenda and de facto run the asylum over at the madhouse.^[1]

While many objectionable forms of propaganda, utilising emotions and epithets exist in Wikipedia; such as promotion of so-called "global warming", the homosexual agenda, branding unpopular scenarios "conspiracy theories", previously dubbing eugenics "pseudoscience" and so on. The most insidious and vulgar form of bias is its toleration of hatred against the European race, its culture and history, including demonisation of political groups who work for its social and economic interests. Thus Metapedia has taken on the metapolitical struggle and is well on the way to surpassing the compromised project.
UNQUOTE
This is perhaps a little overstated but it is very much on the right lines. But see how abusive the Wikipedia gets about the Metapedia,  this upstart operation. The Wikipedia  is part of the Main Stream Media, in fine a  Propaganda operation set up by Jews to be run by Useful Idiots.