From The Garbage Generation: Chapter I
If we are to deal meaningfully with crime, what must be seen is the dehumanizing effect on the individual of slums, racism, ignorance and violence, of corruption and impotence to fulfill rights, of poverty and unemployment and idleness, of generations of malnutrition, of congenital brain damage and prenatal neglect, of sickness and disease, of pollution, of decrepit, dirty, ugly, unsafe, overcrowded housing, of alcoholism and narcotics addiction, of avarice, anxiety, fear, hatred, hopelessness and injustice. These are the fountainheads of crime.
Not so. If we
are to deal meaningfully with crime, what must be seen is its relationship
with the female-headed family. Most criminals come from female-headed
families. Most gang members come from female-headed families. Most addicts
come from female-headed families. Most rapists come from female-headed
families. Most educational failures come from female-headed families. Every
presidential assassin before Hinckley came from a female-headed family or
one in which he had an impossibly bad relationship with his father. Most
illegitimate births occur to females who themselves grew up in female-headed
families.
If we are to deal meaningfully with crime, what we must do is reduce the
number of female-headed families; what we must do is prevent the divorce
courts from expelling half of society's fathers from their homes; what we
must do is terminate a welfare system which displaces millions of men from
the principal male role, that of family-provider. What we must do is make
the father the head of the family.
The female role, says Margaret Mead, is a biological fact; the male role is
a social creation. This is the primary reality concerning human society.
Motherhood has been the dominant feature of mammalian life since its
beginning some two hundred million years ago, most conspicuously since the
great reptiles became extinct and the Age of Mammals began sixty-five
million years ago. Fatherhood in the sense of major male participation in
reproduction is only a few million years old. Fatherhood in the sense of
male headship of families is only a few thousand years old.
What is happening to our society is that it is discarding patriarchal sexual
regulation and reverting to the primeval mammalian pattern of a reproductive
unit consisting of the mother and her offspring, the male putting in an
appearance to perform his minuscule sexual function and then disappearing or
being hauled away to the sausage factory or being reduced to the role of
stud who can be discarded when his female tires of him. "Men and women,"
rejoices feminist-anthropologist Helen Fisher, "are moving toward the kind
of roles they had on the grasslands of Africa millions of years ago....Human
society is now discovering its ancient roots....The recent trend toward
divorce and remarriage is another example of a throwback to earlier
times....[T]he so-called new extended family [read: broken family] may
actually have evolved millennia ago....At long last, society is moving in a
direction that should be highly compatible with our ancient human
spirit....The 'traditional' role of women is a recent invention."
Biologically speaking, it is indeed a recent invention, scarcely older than
the civilization which it made possible and which emerged coevally with it
and created the wealth which reconciled women to accepting it. But women's
new economic independence is leading them to yearn for a return to the
prehistoric mammalian arrangement. "[W]herever women are economically
powerful," says Fisher, "divorce rates are high. You see it in the Kung and
you see it in the United States." Let's say, wherever women are economically
powerful and there are no social guarantees to ensure male headship of
families, divorce rates are high--such being the case among the Kung and the
Americans. The Kung have no social guarantees to ensure male headship of
families because the Kung never emerged from the Stone Age. The Americans
have no social guarantees to ensure male headship of families because there
exists an elementary confusion in the heads of policy makers, lawmakers and
judges, who imagine that the obvious strength of the biological tie between
the mother and the infant (the "biological fact" Margaret Mead refers to)
means that it requires their assistance. A biological fact does not require
the services of the legal system. What does require these services is the
weakest biological link in the family, the role of the father. It was the
creation of this role--only a few thousand years ago--which made patriarchal
civilization possible. Prior to that, mankind had to muddle through the
million years of the Stone Age with the female-headed reproductive
arrangements of the ghetto, the barnyard and the rain forest.
Annex to Chapter I
The Annex is an essential part of the argument of this book and logically belongs at this point in the text. To place it here, however, would be placing a stumbling block in front of the reader, asking him to plow through fifty pages of tedious documentation, filled with repetitious overkill, proving the assertions made in Chapter I. Like the textual notes in an edition of Shakespeare, which nobody reads and which only one reader in hundreds consults, it has to be in the book but it does not have to be read. It is enough that the reader should know that there exists (and can be consulted on pages 000-000) proof that the high-crime, low- achieving areas of society are those with the greatest numbers of families headed by women and that the low-crime, high-achieving groups in society are those with stable, patriarchal families--that the feminist/sexual revolution and its attempt to impose a social organization based on female kinship is a failure and that it is necessary to return to a social organization based on male kinship.
Chapter I
Chapter II
Chapter III
Chapter IV
Chapter V
Chapter VI
Chapter VII
Chapter VIII
Chapter IX
Chapter X
Chapter XI
Annex to chapter I
Additional note
References