Theodor Herzl was a Jew and newspaper reporter working for the Neue Freie Presse [ New Free Press ]. He was at the trial of Alfred Dreyfus, an officer in the French army who was convicted of espionage in 1894 because he was a Jew.
Herzl took the point that Jews were hated. He used it as an excuse to start Zionism and found new state as a refuge for Jews on the run. He wrote Der Judenstaat [ The Jewish State ] to spread his ideas. They worked.
Of course he might have taken the point that they were hated with good reason and invited them to clean up their act. This would have meant earning their living honestly so that was not a runner. Thieving was.
Herzl fancied having Argentina or Palestine but they tried to take Cyprus among other places. The interests of the locals was not an issue as far as he was concerned. Human rights came nowhere. Jews first and last was policy. It still is. We know because they stole Palestine by fraud and hold it by terror. Their recent [ 2008 ] Gaza Massacre killed 1400 people. They do not care in the least.
Ottoman Empire Refused To Give Palestine To Herzl
Abdülhamid's appeals to Muslim sentiment
were powerless against widespread disaffection within his Empire due to
perennial misgovernment. In
Mesopotamia and
Yemen disturbance was endemic; nearer home, a semblance of loyalty was
maintained in the army and among the
Muslim
population only by a system of delation and espionage, and by wholesale
arrests. After his rule began, Abdülhamid became obsessed with the paranoia of
being assassinated and withdrew himself into the fortified seclusion of the
Yıldız Palace.
UNQUOTE
Sensible sort of chap, what?
Herzl And Israel
QUOTE
In
June 1896, with the help of the sympathetic Polish émigré aristocrat Count
Philip Michael Nevlenski, he met for the first time with
Abdul Hamid II
to put forward his proposal for a Jewish state in Palestine. However the
Sultan refused to cede
Palestine
to Zionists, saying, "if one day the Islamic State falls apart then you can
have Palestine for free, but as long as I am alive I would rather have my
flesh be cut up than cut out Palestine from the Muslim land."....
In 1902–03 Herzl was invited to give evidence before the British Royal Commission on Alien Immigration. The appearance brought him into close contact with members of the British government, particularly with Joseph Chamberlain, then secretary of state for the colonies, through whom he negotiated with the Egyptian government for a charter for the settlement of the Jews in Al 'Arish, in the Sinai Peninsula, adjoining southern Palestine.
In 1903, Herzl attempted to obtain support for the Jewish homeland from Pope Pius X. Cardinal Rafael Merry del Val explained to him the Church's policy of non possumus on such matters, saying that as long as the Jews deny the divinity of Christ, the Church certainly could not make a declaration in their favour.
On the failure of that scheme, which took him to Cairo, he received, through L. J. Greenberg, an offer (August 1903) on the part of the British government to facilitate a large Jewish settlement, with autonomous government and under British suzerainty, in British East Africa.......
He [ Herzl ] published the Russian
statement, and brought the British offer, commonly known as the "Uganda
Project," before the Sixth Zionist Congress (Basel, August 1903),
carrying the majority (295:178, 98 abstentions) with him on the question of
investigating this offer, after the Russian delegation stormed out. In 1905,
after investigation, the Congress decided to decline the British offer and
firmly committed itself to a Jewish homeland in the historic Land of Israel.
UNQUOTE
So there you have it from the Wiki which is run by a Jew and pornographer;
Palestine, Sinai, East Africa then Palestine. The fact that the Wiki chooses
to call Palestine the historic land of Israel implies that Jews were
entitled to have the place. Before believing it go to
King Abdullah I on Zionism.
Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.
Trotsky Explains Herzl
QUOTE
Leon Trotsky, partner in revolution
Trotsky was always more worldly
and reflective than Lenin, and warned early on that the Bolsheviks
were on their way to dictatorship, yet to his ignominious end in
1940, he was unable to acknowledge the basic fault of the revolution
he was instrumental in creating.
“Nothing great has been accomplished in history without fanaticism.” − Leon Trotsky.........
Herzl as ‘shameless adventurist’
After the Bolsheviks had seized power, Trotsky declined Lenin’s offer
to be party leader, choosing instead the post of commissar of foreign affairs
and then commissar of the Red Army, which he commanded with an iron hand
during the subsequent civil war. The Bolsheviks’ crackdown on dissent began
almost immediately, however, and in it Trotsky adopted − and long afterward
defended − the proposition that to safeguard the revolution (meaning the
Bolsheviks’ one-party rule), any means was justified, including mass
executions and hellish exile to cow dissidents of all stripes. With Trotsky’s
conversion to Bolshevik orthodoxy, Rubenstein observes almost angrily, “the
country was now in the hands of determined Marxists who would stop at nothing
to hold onto power and impose their ideological views.”
Perhaps with a nod to the book’s inclusion in Yale’s “Jewish Lives” series, Rubenstein also accords ample space to an examination of Trotsky’s ambivalence about his Jewish identity and how it affected his attitude toward fellow-Jews. Firmly opposed to Zionism, the young Trotsky reviled Theodor Herzl as a “shameless adventurist” and his goal of establishing a Jewish state as a “tragic mirage.” He was equally critical of the Bund, the Jewish Socialist alliance originally recognized as the representative of Jewish workers within the Russian Social Democratic Party, deriding it as an alternate expression of parochial Jewish nationalism.
Yet Trotsky was anything but insensitive to the predicament
of Europe’s Jews. Rubenstein particularly emphasizes his life-long outrage at
how both the czarist and Stalinist regimes exploited, indeed deliberately
ignited, anti-Semitic feeling among the population to enhance their hold on
power. He also contends that in 1913, when Trotsky, already a “convinced
internationalist,” wrote about the plight of Romania’s Jews (after covering
the two Balkan Wars as a military correspondent) and about the infamous
Beilis trial (a classic blood libel) in Ukraine, the wretched lives of his
subjects touched a chord so deep within him that he showed himself to be “a
Jew in spite of himself.”
UNQUOTE
Was Trotters being bitchy or on the right lines? Herzl may have
done more damage in the long run. A lot in this context means huge. Founding
Israel may lead to World War III
Theodor Herzl Negotiated
- ex Encyclopaedia Judaica
QUOTE