Kosher slaughter is cruel. That seems obvious enough just like the indifference of the Jews who are the perpetrators. That is even assuming they play it straight, a very dubious assumption with those of little foreskin. See Jew Is Guilty On 86 Charges. The same applies to Islamics whose halal slaughter is much the same. The system is to slit the animal's throat while it is conscious. Her Majesty's Government has chosen to let Jews carry on doing it because Jews have influence, because Jews pay politicians, bribe politicians, blackmail politicians, are politicians. They also lie, grossly, systematically, blatantly, with malice aforethought - see Israelis Claim Stunning Is Cruel for an example.
Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition has also ignored the matter. See Religious Slaughter - The Labour Government Attitude
It was the Labour Party who decided to outlaw Fox Hunting, claiming it was cruel. They did not care in the slightest about foxes or cruelty for that matter. They did hate the landed gentry and anyone who followed the hunt. It was corrupt abuse of the legal process. Of course the bribes they get from the Jews compensate for any amount of cruelty. But that is not quite the point of this little essay.
The Farm Animal Welfare Council is a branch of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs or DEFRA. They obviously have vets to advize them on the medical aspects of welfare. Their views are put in Kosher Slaughter and Kosher Slaughter 2. They are unsurprising. It is cruel.
Kosher Slaughter And Cruelty tells us:-
QUOTE
Pain and distress during exsanguination
194. We have carefully considered the representations we have received which have put forward the view that a neck cut is not painful provided it is a rapid, uninterrupted movement carried out with an extremely sharp knife. It is difficult to measure pain and distress during the slaughter process in an objective scientific manner and subjective indicators, such as behavioural responses and vocalisation, are prevented from being displayed because of the degree of restraint and the severance of the trachea respectively. By the same token, it is impossible to state with objectivity that an animal would not feel pain and distress following such a procedure.195. When a very large transverse incision is made across the neck a number of vital tissues are transected including: skin, muscle, trachea, oesophagus, carotid arteries, jugular veins, major nerve trunks (e.g. vagus and phrenic nerves) plus numerous minor nerves. Such a drastic cut will inevitably trigger a barrage of sensory information to the brain in a sensible (conscious) animal. We are persuaded that such a massive injury would result in very significant pain and distress in the period before insensibility supervenes......
Time to loss of brain responsiveness
198. Loss of sensibility post-cut can be detected by observing brain function through electroencephalographic methodology - a lack of response indicating certain insensibility or death. The scientific evidence shows that sheep become insensible within 5-7 seconds of the cut (3-7 seconds in goats). Adult cattle, however, may take between 22 and 40 seconds to become insensible. This period may be extended should occlusion of the carotid arteries take place. Work done on calves has shown a variation in period to insensibility from 10-120 seconds depending on the extent of occlusion of the carotid arteries or ballooning in blood vessels. Furthermore, a separate study of brain response after Shechita slaughter of cattle compared to that after captive-bolt stunning indicated responses for up to 60 seconds in the former and no response in the latter. (The difference in the times to loss of sensibility between the various species is due to anatomical differences in the blood supply to the brain).
UNQUOTE
The FAWC paper states the fairly obvious.
Ritual Slaughter
Of course Jews and Muslims are allowed to do what they will in their slaughterhouses. To find out about their specific exemption in English law go to:- Ritual Slaughter or Religious Slaughter - The Labour Government Attitude
Jew And Thief Guilty Of 86 Charges - 72 More To Go
QUOTE
The former manager of an Iowa kosher slaughterhouse that was the site of a massive immigration raid was convicted last Thursday on 86 financial fraud charges that could bring a prison sentence of hundreds of years. Sholom Rubashkin is still awaiting sentencing and faces a second federal trial on 72 immigration charges.
Jurors returned the verdict against Rubashkin, 50, on their second day of deliberations after a nearly month long trial. Rubashkin had faced 91 charges, including bank, mail and wire fraud, and money laundering. He was found not guilty on five of 19 charges alleging he did not make timely payments to livestock dealers.
UNQUOTE
Robbing suppliers, using illegal immigrants, producing fraudulent paper. They are career criminals but then they are Jews.
Religious Slaughter - The Labour Government Attitude
QUOTE
The Labour Government’s Response to the 2003 FAWC Report
The Labour Government in April 2004 announced that........... rejected the idea of a ban on the production of kosher or halal meat............On 8 March 2005, the Labour Government produced a fuller response to the FAWC Report:
Recommendation 197: Where an animal has not been stunned, the OVS must ensure that nothing is inserted into the neck wound post-cut.
Response: Do not accept......... We accept that such action will stimulate nociceptive pathways and in a conscious animal may lead to a [ claimed/alleged ] perception of pain. However the length of time for an animal to lose consciousness after the neck cut is disputed. We will continue to explore with the religious authorities whether, following the cut, there could be a greater delay before this inspection is carried out.Recommendation 201: Council considers that slaughter without pre-stunning is unacceptable and that the Government should repeal the current exemption. Response: Do not accept. The Government does not intend to ban the slaughter of animals without prior stunning by religious groups............. The balance of current scientific evidence also suggests that those cattle which receive an immediate post-cut stun are likely to suffer less than those that do not. However we recognise that this latter conclusion is disputed.
UNQUOTE
So Labour is going to let Jews get away with it and, no, they are not going to give reasons. Try bribery though. It fits nicely. They just do not care.