London Looters
The London looters were brought to us by
Her Majesty's Government with the
enthusiastic collusion of
Her Allegedly Loyal Opposition.
They are traitors all.
Tower Hamlets
QUOTE
Controlling Tower Hamlets council means controlling
£1 billion a year, every year, enough to keep a lot of Pakistani snouts firmly
in the trough - and doing whatever it takes to keep it that way.
UNQUOTE
How much of that £1 billion finds its way back to Pakistan? Quite a lot is my
guess, several millions at the very least.
Waltham Forest
QUOTE
Munir
Zamir is involved in the local politics of Waltham Forest, in North-east London.
He is also an allegedly ex-terrorist recruiter, in the Islamic cause and
therefore an enemy of England. Now he marketed as a reformed character who
really knows about these awful people and he is making hay while the sun shines.
UNQUOTE
Import Pakistanis, import thieves then pretend to be surprised when they carry
on thieving.
Livingstone Has Five Bastards Out Of Three Women [ 4 April 2008 ]
QUOTE
Ken Livingstone has defended his
private life after it was revealed he had five children by three
different women........... "What Londoners want to discuss in this election is transport, crime,
housing, good community relations and the environment."
UNQUOTE
Londoners do want good service. They don't want light fingered
politicians robbing them blind and giving their money to ethnics and buying
votes. Livingstone has been pandering to the wrong undesirables which
is why various swine are telling the truth about him as voters go the
polls.
Livingstone,
Fraud And Islamics [ 3 April 2008 ]
QUOTE
AT
CHRISTMAS, political commentators assumed Ken Livingstone was a
shoo-in for mayor of London. As Easter comes, he is fighting to save
his career. To understand why, you have to grasp the outrage on the
left at his decision to turn his back on liberal British Muslims and
ally himself with ultra-reactionary Islamists........
Revulsion
at his strange alliances lies behind the devastating leaks about
public money going astray and six-figure salaries going to members of
Socialist Action, the tiny Trotskyist sect Livingstone employs at
public expense............
"Livingstone
was more interested in the Muslim vote and thought that by pandering
to al-Qaradawi he could get it. He began to say things he would
never have said before, calling a Jewish reporter a concentration
camp guard and telling Jewish businessmen to leave the
country."....... For the past two months, Singh has been,
er, singing like a canary and telling the papers how Socialist Action
appointees fundraised and campaigned for Livingstone when they were
meant to be neutral civil servants.
UNQUOTE
Islamics
don't mind thieving as long as they are getting the profits.
Fraudulent misapplication of public funds is good reason for the
police to do something useful. But I am sure that dear Mr
Livingstone will be able to confirm that he did not give various
foreigners money in order to buy their votes.
PS
It seems that inciting murder is not a crime when Pakistanis do
it.
PPS Singh
Babbles
PPPS Feathering
their own nests is part of the pay off
City of London Corporation
QUOTE
The City of London
Corporation (formerly
known as the Corporation of London)[1] is the municipal
governing body of the
City of London. It
exercises control only over the City (the "Square Mile," so called for
its approximate area), and not over
Greater London.
It has three main aims: to promote the Business City as the world's
leading international financial and business centre; to provide high
quality local government services; and to provide a range of additional
services for the benefit of London, Londoners and the nation.
The City of London Corporation is formally termed the Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London, thus including the Lord Mayor, the Court of Aldermen, and the Court of Common Council.
Local government legislation often makes special provision for the City to be treated as a London borough.
The City of London does not generally exercise authority over two historic extra-parochial areas, the Middle Temple and the Inner Temple, which are adjoining enclaves for two of the Inns of Court in the west of the City. Some statutory functions of the Corporation extend into these two areas.
London Calling
Private Eye puts a view, a rather well informed view and one
the main stream media does not let us in on.
Metropolitan Board of
Works
QUOTE
The Metropolitan
Board of Works (MBW) was
the principal instrument of
London-wide
government from 1855 until the establishment of the
London County Council
in 1889. Its principal responsibility was to provide infrastructure to
cope with London's rapid growth, which it successfully accomplished.
The MBW was an appointed rather than elected body. This lack of
accountability made it unpopular with Londoners, especially in its
latter years when it fell prey to
corruption.
London's growth had rapidly accelerated with the increase in railway commuting from the 1830s onwards. However London's local government was chaotic, with hundreds of specialist authorities (few of them elected) representing parts of streets. All had to agree in order to provide services which crossed their boundaries.
In 1835 elected municipal boroughs had been set up covering every major city except London. The City of London, only the very core of the sprawling metropolis, was untouched by the Municipal Corporations Act 1835 and resisted all moves to expand its borders to include the poorer inner-city districts surrounding it. This meant that three counties had authority over the metropolitan area: Middlesex covered the area north of the Thames and west of the River Lee, Surrey the area to the south and south-west, and Kent the far south east.
In
1837 an attempt was made to set up a London-wide elected
authority, however the wealthier districts of
Marylebone and
Westminster
resisted this and ultimately defeated the move. In 1854 it was proposed
to divide London in to seven boroughs, each represented on a
Metropolitan Board of Works. The proposal to divide the city into
boroughs was abandoned but the board of works was set up in 1855.
UNQUOTE
